Animal testing was useful in early science, such as in Aristotle's time, but scientiÞc understanding has advanced to the point where animal testing is unproÞtable. Shannon holds a Bachelor of Arts in music with a focus on performance. Even in our current state of the world, there are so many bacteria and viruses around and we know quite little about the majority of them yet. Animal testing helps to lessen the risk of an unplanned event occurring when humans use or ingest the products that are part of the animal testing experiment. Animal testing has many advantages and disadvantages. Examples essay type questions. Because of animal testing, many cures and treatments to a variety of illnesses and diseases […] In the United States, over 60 billion animals are killed for food each year. It is said we no longer need testing for makeup, lotions, personal hygiene products or cleaners, yet companies continue to subject animals to unbearable and a life of misery. Animal Cruelty Many of the animals that are used in labs for medical research are left traumatized, permanently disabled, or even dead. Because many activities in this area are self-directed, it is easy enough for corruption to enter the research arena to create results that support bringing a product to market. This is because most of growing up period animal is shorter than human. Also, the use of animal research and testing has been confirmed to be very affordable and speeds up the medical research process. Animal testing also usually takes place over the course of several months, which leads to higher costs for the companies who rely on it. If scientists perform tests on computer models, test tube-grown cells or “lower organisms” (such as eggs or invertebrates, rather than warm-blooded animals), they may not see as full a picture of the test results as they would with testing on live animals (or animals which are more similar to humans). If animal testing were not available, then there would be no way to test the safety of a product on organic tissues before applying it to humans. In comparison, human cell-line tests, are up to 80% accurate. Reasons For Animal Testing. The goal of this process is to ensure the safety of humanity when new cosmetics are developed. It stands for the “lethal dose 50%” test, where animals are given test substances until half of them die. Lantus Solostar is an insulin pen injection that was developed and approved for individuals with diabetes mellitus through testing on beagles, rabbits, rats, and guinea pigs 5. Animal Welfare Act Is Bypassed The Animal Welfare Act, or AWA, was signed in 1966 in order to protect certain animals from cruel treatment. You can achieve false positives or negatives based on the approaches used by the researchers. 1. Since the aim of scientific testing is to understand the interactions and processes between levels of structural organization of the human body, animal tests are frequently employed to study biological activities and certain diseases (Royal Society, 2004). We should be asking ourselves this: do animals suffer? Animal testing is not done on the cheap. For the cosmetics company, being involved with testing is a public relations nightmare. They are forced fed, deprived of food and water, restrained physically for prolonged periods, inflicted with burns, wounds and pain to test for healing process effects and remedies, and even killed through neck-breaking or asphyxiation. Animal testing is making use of animals in experiments carried out for the betterment of human lives. Animal Testing Used to Aid Human Development Should Be Decreased to a Minimum 843 Words | 4 Pages. Thus, legalization of animal testing must be accepted. 6. They are being kept away not only from nature but also from their families to be tormented. This raises very serious red flags for lots of animal rights groups and activists who believe animals should be given the same compassion as humans. In high-dosage groups, animals might endure bleeding, rashes, eye contact, forced inhalation of products, and suffer from paralysis, seizures, and convulsions. Our question is incorrect. Cons of Animal Testing. For the average mouse, their lifespan might be 3 years. Drugs can be potentially and immediately harmful to humans, especially during the testing phase of a product, so animal testing allows for researchers to determine the quality and safety of a product before humans take it. This is because they carefully choose animals whose rights do not fall under the jurisdiction of the AWA. There are several advantages of cosmetic testing on animals. The animals which are in testing facilities are fully vaccinated, provided food, water, and shelter, while being able to have a limited amount of independence. Cosmetics are not a necessity of human life. There will always be arguments for and against such kind of testing. Unapproved products pose huge risk levels to all human volunteers. List of Cons of Animal Experimentation. Many people have questions about animal testing ethics and the animal testing debate. 3. Animal testing in cosmetics uses non-human subjects to examine the variables which could exist when specific products are applied. So what are advantages and disadvantages of using animals? On top of that, animal testing may occur more than once and over the course of months, which means that additional costs are incurred. Cells grown in a test tube (in vitro) and computer simulations can offer a good idea of how animals and humans would respond to certain tests. If too much harm comes to the animal, then that increases the chance of harm eventually happening to a human if the produce were to be used. List of Cons of Animal Experimentation. Advantages and Disadvantages of Cell / Tissue Culture. Even if a product is cruelty-free and not tested on animals now, it may be based on information obtained years ago that was based on animal testing. Almost every major advancement humanity made in the field of medicine and product development relied on animal testing in some way. The 3R Research Foundation, a foimdation composed of dedicated professors published a book on how to replace animal resource. You need food to eat. Cruel and inhumane treatment Protocols in animal testing are often painful to the test subjects. 1. (2010) indicated that when using the animal experiment to design models of medicine, it needed a numerous testing to conclude the final consequence. Animal testing harms the animals – there’s no getting around that fact. Those against animal testing advocate three Rs: replacement (finding alternative methods of testing), reduction (using animal testing as little as necessary) and refinement (making sure that animal testing is done in the most humane and pain-free fashion).